> Feed: 5. Fifth Level of Learning - The Wes Penre Papers
> Title: Fifth Level of Learning, Paper 7: Deities Exposed in Hinduism and Middle-Eastern Mythology
> Author: Wes Penre Publications
by Wes Penre, Written on Thursday, August 21, 2014
Posted on Monday, January 26, 2015
Edited by Professor Bob Stannard
I. "Lord of the Host" and "Leader of the Devas"
I know that it is very exciting and mind-tickling to read about all these alien
races who supposedly are involved in human affairs. Many people who are into
Ufology and Exopolitics probably feel the same way--they want there to be a lot
of different ET races involved, but very few want to meet them in real life,
unless it's from a somewhat safe place--and maybe not even then.
When I am searching for references, I see many websites where the most fantastic
ET races are listed as being current or past visitors to Earth--or just
inhabitants of certain solar systems out there. Almost all of it is
disinformation, and even if someone happens to list star races that we actually
do know exist, people have a tendency to put most of them in their own category,
with their own separate agenda.
I am sorry if I disappoint somebody now, but this is simply not the case. Planet
Earth is currently Lord En.ki's domain, and he won't allow any star races access
to this planet, unless he trusts them or has a use for them. If a star race
would actually be able to come in, there would definitely be a war. This has
happened, but thus far, the AIF has been able to keep the domain to themselves.
I am not saying there are not a lot of different star races lurking on Earth and
in the solar system, but they are all part of the AIF--they answer to their
boss, who is En.ki/Lucifer. This is my conviction, or this trap we're sitting in
wouldn't work. In juxtaposition to this, there are benevolent
beings--interdimensional of course--who are here, watching over us, wondering
where we are going from here. I can imagine how they have to restrain themselves
not to interact, but as long as we are walking around blindfolded, there is not
much they can do. En.ki knows this and probably doesn't feel very threatened by
them--hence, he lets them be here, instead minding businesses he thinks are more
important. I am sure he is not interested in chasing all these "intruders" one
by one, or ten by ten. He would have to chase them like we are chasing
flies--he's there with the swatter, and the "fly" is gone, or somewhere else,
out of his reach. En.ki can't block each and every dimension from having access,
once they have figured out Earth's weird, manipulated frequency. Hence, single
beings, or small groups of beings, are either here in our vicinity or checking
in on us from a "distance." In the "soul dimension," there is no distance and no
time as we think of it, so they don't need to be in our vicinity (as we look at
it) in order to oversee what's going on.
This is important to know, so I wanted to start the paper with this little piece
of information. It will soon be self-evident why I mention it here.
Now, let's get back to the Vedas.
In the Vedas, we have something called The Elephant and the Owl, and I'd like us
to consider that for a moment. If we start with the Elephant, it is associated
with Ganesha, so let's examine that.
Quote #1: Ganesha (/??'ne???/; Sanskrit (IAST): Ga?e?a; listen (help?info)),
also spelled Ganesh, and also known as Ganapati and Vinayaka, is a widely
worshipped deity in the Hindu pantheon. [2] His image is found throughout India
and Nepal. [3] Hindu sects worship him regardless of affiliations. [4] Devotion
to Ganesha is widely diffused and extends to Jains, Buddhists, and beyond
India. [5]
Although he is known by many attributes, Ganeshas elephant head makes him easy
to identify. [6] Ganesha is widely revered as the remover of obstacles, [7] the
patron of arts and sciences and the deva of intellect and wisdom. [8] As the god
of beginnings, he is honoured at the start of rituals and ceremonies. Ganesha is
also invoked as patron of letters and learning during writing sessions. [9] [10]
Several texts relate mythological anecdotes associated with his birth and
exploits and explain his distinct iconography.^ [1] [1]
In these two paragraphs, we see the usual jargon about "the patron of arts and
sciences and the deva of intellect and wisdom." We've encountered this a number
of times before, but in this instance, let us highlight itbefore we continue.
Quote #2: The name Ganesha is a Sanskrit compound, joining the words gana
(Sanskrit: ??; IAST: ga?a), meaning a group, multitude, or categorical system
and isha (Sanskrit: ??; IAST: ??a), meaning lord or master. [15] The word ga?a
when associated with Ganesha is often taken to refer to the ga?as, a troop of
semi-divine beings that form part of the retinue of Shiva (IAST: ?iva).^ [2] [2]
Now, as we moved on, we are suddenly encountering Lord Shiva, whom we know is
Marduk. There are commentators, who interpret the term, "Lord of the Ganas"
meaning "Lord of Hosts," or Lord of Created Categories," such as the five
elements.
If we want to find similar motifs, where do we look? Well, how about Yahweh
Sabaoth, which some say means "Lord of Hosts?" Moreover, many associate Yahweh
Sabaoth with a war god. Now, who else is acclaimed war god? Well, we have the
War God Ares, of course. Let's look into this some more. Here is from
Preceptaustin.org.^ [3] [3]
ISAIAH 31:4-5
Quote #3: For thus says Jehovah [4] to me, As the lion or the young lion growls
over his prey, against which a band of shepherds is called out & he will not
be terrified at their voice nor disturbed at their noise, so will the LORD of
hosts come down to wage war on Mt Zion and on its hill. Like flying birds so
the LORD of hosts will protect Jerusalem. He will protect & deliver it. He
will pass over (pacach also describes the Passover cf uses in Exodus) & rescue
it.^ [4] [5]
Here we can see without any doubt that the Lord of Hosts is a war-waging
god--and,
Quote #4: In the late Babylonian astral-theological system [6] Nergal is
related to the planet [7] Mars [8]. As a fiery god of destruction and war,
Nergal doubtless seemed an appropriate choice for the red planet, and he was
equated by the Greeks [9] either to the combative demigod Heracles [10] (Latin
Hercules [11]) or to the war-god Ares [12] (Latin Mars) hence the current name
of the planet. In Assyro-Babylonian ecclesiastical art the great lion-headed
colossi serving as guardians to the temples and palaces seem to symbolise
Nergal, just as the bull-headed colossi probably typify Ninurta.^ [5] [13]
I don't want to confuse the readers with a lot of strange terms in my quotes,
but at the same time, it's good for us all, when we're doing research, to become
familiar with some foreign terms. If we don't, it's hard to get anywhere. It
doesn't mean we need to look up each and every word to find its meaning, but
it's nice once we get to the point when we can skim an article, or a paragraph,
with unfamiliar nomenclature and still be able to see what is important in it
just by scanning it.
Regardless, now we have an association between Ganesha, Nergal, and Ares, which
corresponds with Marduk, En.ki, and Marduk, respectively.
What about Apollo?
Quote #5: Thus, the Greeks most often associated Apollos name with the Greek
verb ?pollymi (apollymi), to destroy.^ [6] [14]
[...]
Quote #6: The Hebrew term Abaddon (Hebrew [15]: ??????????, ??add?n), and its
Greek equivalent Apollyon (Greek [16]: ?pollyon, Apollyon), appear in the
Bible [17] as a place of destruction and an angel [18], respectively. In the
Hebrew Bible [19], abaddon is used with reference to a bottomless pit, often
appearing alongside the place ???? (sheol [20]), meaning the land of the
dead.^ [7] [21]
Here we have the "bottomless pit," and a "place of destruction," so we are back
to the Underworld (Netherworld), interestingly enough. We can also see an
association between Apollo and Abaddon, who are each other's counterparts--i.e.
they are both equated with Marduk. Few people, however, connect Apollo with
destruction and the Underworld, but here it is--black on white.
Let us continue.
Quote #7: In Hindu (post-Vedic) tradition, Shesha (IAST: ?e?a, Devanagari:
???), also known as Sheshanaga (IAST: ?e?an?ga, Devanagari: ??????) or
Adishesha (IAST: ?di ?e?a, Devan?gar?: ??????) is the king of all N?gas
(serpent deities), one of the primal beings of creation, and according to the
Bhagavata Purana, an avatar of the Supreme God [1] known as Narayana.^ [8] [22]
Naryana is thus the "king of all N?gas. Then, who is Naryana?
Quote #8: Narayana (Sanskrit: ?????? IAST: N?r?ya?a) is the Vedic Supreme
God [1] [2] (including his different avatars) in Hinduism, venerated as the
Supreme Being in Vaishnavism. He is also known as Vishnu and Hari and is
venerated as Purushottama or Supreme Purusha in Hindu sacred texts such as the
Bhagavad Gita, [3] the Vedas and the Puranas.^ [9] [23]
The Nagas--the serpent beings--are said to be associated with Patala, one of the
Lower Lokas (see previous paper). Let's look again at Patala (my emphasis in
italics):
Quote #8: In Hindu cosmology, Patala or Patal (Sanskrit: ?????, P?t?la)
denotes the seven lower regions of the universe which are located under the
earth. [1] [2] [3] Patala is often translated as underworld or netherworld.
Patala is composed of seven regions or lokas, [4] [5] [6] the seventh and lowest
of them is also called Patala or Naga-loka, the region of the Nagas. The
Danavas (demon sons of Danu), Daityas (demon sons of Diti), Yakshas and the
snake-people Nagas live in the realms of Patala. [2] According to Hindu
cosmology, the universe is divided into the three worlds: Svarga (Heaven: six
upper regions), Prithvi (earth) and Patala (the seven lower regions)- the
underworld and netherworld.^ [10] [24]
What I am intending to do is to show the reader how these few beings are in
charge of every part of our environment--the airways, the planetary surface, the
Underworld, the ether, and the entire solar system. There are no other beings
and no other star races that are not associated with Lucifer to begin with, who
have any real power in our solar system at this point in time! Ufology people
and other researchers and truth-seekers may tell you otherwise and show you
strange lists that include ET races that supposedly are here, having their own
agendas. This is not so! The star races associated with Earth have a connection
with Lucifer/En.ki, and that is what it's all about. The lists you may see are
just made up from off the top of somebody's head and then spread over the
Internet as if it were the truth. There is no evidence combined with these
lists, but I have the evidence. The evidence is there, regardless of the belief
system.
To this, I do have to add something, however. I already mentioned the
interdimensionals, who are here to observe, but there are also at least two
factions of Lucifer's people, as it seems. These factions, however, stem from
the same uniformed star races who came here to support Lucifer in his Rebellion.
A take-over of the planet by making it into one unit--a One World Government and
a New World Order--is imminent regardless which faction we're talking about.
They both want the same thing. The only thing they may be in disagreement with
is how it should be done. On one level, it seems to be a human split more than
an ET split, but these humans have some ET star races supporting them. We will
talk more about that in a later paper.
To show the reader a little bit more what I mean, I am going to jump between a
few mythologies just for a moment, and you'll get my point, I believe.
With the quotes above, we are also back to the Egyptian mythology about their
belief in the Afterlife and the Netherworld--this is a huge part of Egyptian
mythology.
Now, when we've looked at the Elephant, let's look at the Owl. The owl is
connected with wisdom, something the reader may know, and funny also is that the
word "owl" can be found in the English word knowledge, which I realized a few
minutes ago.
The owl is associated with Sophia, according to some, and to Lilith, according
to others. For those who don't have a clear picture of Sophia, let's quickly
define her. This is the Gnostic view on her:
Quote #9: Sophia (Greek Sof?a, meaning wisdom, Coptic tcofia tsophia [1]) is a
major theme, along with Knowledge (Greek gn?sis gnosis, Coptic sooun), among
many of the early Christian knowledge-theologies grouped by the heresiologist
Irenaeus as gnostikos, learned. Gnosticism is a 17th-century term expanding
the definition of Irenaeus groups to include other syncretic and mystery
religions. [2]
In Gnostic tradition, Sophia is a feminine figure, analogous to the human soul
but also simultaneously one of the feminine aspects of God. [citation needed]
Gnostics held that she was the syzygy of Jesus Christ [citation needed] (i.e. the
Bride of Christ), and Holy Spirit of the Trinity. She is occasionally referred
to by the Hebrew equivalent of Acham?th (?chamoth, Hebrew ???? chokhmah) and as
Prunikos (Proynikos). In the Nag Hammadi texts, Sophia is the lowest Aeon, or
anthropic expression of the emanation of the light of God. She is considered to
have fallen from grace in some way, in so doing creating or helping to create
the material world.
[...]
In most versions of the Gnostic mythos, it is Sophia who brings about this
instability in the Pleroma, in turn bringing about the creation of materiality.
According to some Gnostic texts, the crisis occurs as a result of Sophia trying
to emanate without her syzygy or, in another tradition, because she tries to
breach the barrier between herself and the unknowable Bythos. After
cataclysmically falling from the Pleroma, Sophias fear and anguish of losing her
life (just as she lost the light of the One) causes confusion and longing to
return to it. Because of these longings, matter (Greek: hyl?, ?li) and soul
(Greek: psych?, psychi) accidentally come into existence. The creation of the
Demiurge (also known as Yaldabaoth, Son of Chaos) is also a mistake made during
this exile. The Demiurge proceeds to create the physical world in which we live,
ignorant of Sophia, who nevertheless manages to infuse some spiritual spark or
pneuma into his creation.
In the Pistis Sophia, Christ is sent from the Godhead in order to bring Sophia
back into the fullness (Pleroma). Christ enables her to again see the light,
bringing her knowledge of the spirit (Greek: pneuma, pneyma). Christ is then
sent to earth in the form of the man Jesus to give men the Gnosis needed to
rescue themselves from the physical world and return to the spiritual world. In
Gnosticism, the Gospel story of Jesus is itself allegorical: it is the Outer
Mystery, used as an introduction to Gnosis, rather than being literally true in
a historical context. For the Gnostics, the drama of the redemption of the
Sophia through Christ or the Logos is the central drama of the universe. The
Sophia resides in all of us as the Divine Spark.
[...]
This meant, according to the Gnostic interpretation, that the Sophia has her
dwelling-place on the heights above the created universe.^ [11] [25]
In other words, if we translate this to my papers, Sophia is the Queen of the
Stars, who created the material universe--including Earth--and "made mistakes,"
according to some, by losing Her domain here--the solar system, in other words.
The rest are Gnostic viewpoints on Jesus' role in all this, etc., which is
nothing more than AIF propaganda, as we know it, but at least the reader gets an
idea whom we are talking about when we say Sofia.
Now, if we're going back to where we were, looking at the owl, we were
discussing that Sophia and Lilith had some association to this Bird of Wisdom.
However, who else has association with Wisdom with a capital "W?"
[image 26]Fig. 1. The One-Eyed Odin from the Norse mythology.
Quote #10: In Mesopotamian religion and mythology, Enki, also known as Ea, was
the God of wisdom and intelligence. Wisdom was achieved by restoring balance.
In Norse mythology, the god Odin is especially known for his wisdom, often
acquired through various hardships and ordeals involving pain and
self-sacrifice. In one instance he plucked out an eye and offered it to M?mir,
guardian of the well of knowledge and wisdom, in return for a drink from the
well. [33] In another famous account, Odin hanged himself for nine nights from
Yggdrasil, the World Tree that unites all the realms of existence, suffering
from hunger and thirst and finally wounding himself with a spear until he
gained the knowledge of runes for use in casting powerful magic. [34] He was
also able to acquire the mead of poetry from the giants, a drink of which
could grant the power of a scholar or poet, for the benefit of gods and
mortals alike.^ [12] [27]
As the reader can see, we can go on and on, exploring one religion or culture
after another, coming to a very similar result--in this case it is already easy
to see that the Lord of Asgard (or Asg?rd in Swedish--the Heaven for humans,
where the Norse gods lived), Odin, is another counterpart of Lord En.ki. The
one-eyed god can also be considered as "he with the all-seeing eye."
To get to what I want to show the reader, we are going to stay in the
Underworld. We will continue to look into the Hindu Goddess Lakshmi, in whom we
see a link between the Elephant and the Owl. Ganesha, as we have seen, is
connected with Shiva (Marduk), and his consort is often portrayed as Shakti. It
is important to point out, however, that there are many Shaktis in the Vedic
texts, and Vishnu's consort is merely one of them. More than a name of a person,
it also can denote consort in general. We don't have space to look into each one
of these Shaktis, but when I mention her, I am referring to Lord Vishnu's
consort, unless something else is indicated. In fact, it is believed that
"Shakti" originally was the personification of the seven stars in the Pleiadian
star cluster.^ [13] [28] The Owl is then being associated, e.g. with Lakshmi, one
of Vishnu's nine "Shaktis", i.e. wives. Sophia, we have already noticed is
related to Ishtar, who is the counterpart of Inanna, but also of Isis, which is
important to remember--something not all people who are into studying this are
aware of.
I understand if the reader feels a little overwhelmed by all the names, but it
was set up that way by En.ki and his son just so people would not have the
patience and means to find things out. Now, perhaps for the first time, you have
the chance to understand out history as it happened on the most solid timeline,
which brought us here. Hence, I have narrowed this down to a level where we all
can understand it if we don't have time to deep-study it. I am aware that this
level is more demanding that the previous, but it is Level V--The Fifth Level of
Learning--after all.
The Owl, I said, is associated with Lakshmi, so let's look up Lakshmi.
Quote #11: Lakshmi (Sanskrit: ??????? lak?m?, Hindi pronunciation: ['l?k?mi])
is the Hindu Goddess of wealth, love, prosperity (both material and
spiritual), fortune, and the embodiment of beauty.^ [14] [29]
Lakshmi is the Goddess of "wealth,"--"both material and spiritual wealth,"
amongst other things. Maybe the reader has also noticed that all these schools
are associated with "enlightenment,"^ [15] [30] which is, in turn, associated
with Luciferianism.
Moreover:
Quote #12: Lakshmi is described as bestowing coins of prosperity and flanked
by elephants signifying her royal power. However, in some texts, she has an
owl as her vahana.^ [16] [31]
Here we see Lakshmi's association with the Owl, and below (in fig. 2) we see
Vishnu and Lakshmi, one of his consorts,^ [17] [32] sitting together. In another
passage, she is said to be Ulkavahini--One who Rides an Owl.^ [18] [33]
[image 34]Fig. 2. Lord Vishnu with Lakshmi on his right.
I just mentioned that Lakshmi is one of the nine Shaktis (wives) of Vishnu.
However, the characters I am exposing here are mainly Shiva (Marduk), and his
consorts. After all, it seems that Lakshmi was related to En.ki.
In Level IV, I argued that Marduk also took over En.ki's wife, Queen Ere?kigal,
after En.ki was no longer able to reproduce, and started copulating with her in
order to create a new human hybrid race. In other words, Vishnu took over
En.ki's role with Lakshmi to create a new human hybrid race. Even if he never
took Lakshmi as his consort, Vishnu's desire for Lakshmi is clearly noted in the
scriptures.
Quote #13: As soon as the gods saw Lakshmi, they all fell in love with her
beauty. Shiva claimed Lakshmi as his wife, but since he had already taken the
Moon, her hand was given to Vishnu, whom Lakshmi herself preferred.^ [19] [35]
There is little doubt that Lakshmi is a Hindu name for Ere?kigal.
II. More Interesting Revelations Regarding the "Jesus Myth"
How does Jesus fit in with the Hindu religion and the Vedas? Indeed, there are
some interesting points I'd like to make in addition to what we earlier have
collaborated on one of the biblical main characters. Again, we need to follow a
trail. This time, we will start by looking into a Hindu persona named Rishabha.
Quote #14: In Hinduism, Rishabha is the eighth Avatar of Vishnu of the
twenty-two incarnations listed in the Bhagavata Purana.^ [20] [36]
Quote #15: He [Rishabha] was the first of the twenty-four t?rtha?karas or
ford-makers, teachers who established the Jain teachings. According to
legends, he belonged to the Ikshvaku dynasty of ancient Ayodhya.^ [21] [37]
Rishabha was thus the eight avatar of Vishnu, and the first one who established
the "Jain teachings," which is the same as "Jainism. So, let's continue,
Quote #16: In Jainism, a T?rtha?kara is a human being who helps in achieving
liberation and enlightenment as an arihant. According to Jain scriptures, [1]
that which helps one to cross the great ocean of worldly life is a t?rtha
"ford" and a person who fills that role is a t?rtha?kara "ford-maker".
T?rtha?karas achieve liberation and enlightenment by destroying their
constraining (karmas) and becoming role models and leaders for those seeking
spiritual guidance. [2] [3] They also seek Kevala Jnana, a state of permanent,
perpetual, absolute knowledge of the Soul; it is the precursor to final
liberation from the cycle of birth and death.
The twenty-four known t?rtha?karas in this time cycle revitalized the Jain
religion by establishing the fourfold sangha order which consists of male and
female monastics (sadhus and sadhvis) and male and female lay persons
(?r?vakas and ?r?vikas).^ [22] [38]
Twenty-four is an important number. We have seen it in the Wes Penre Papers,
Level III, when we discussed the RA Material and the Council of Saturn that took
advice from the Council of 24. Also, there is an interesting references to "24"
in the Bible--The Book of Revelations, King James Version.
Quote #17: And round about the throne were four and twenty seats: and upon the
seats I saw four and twenty elders sitting, clothed in white raiment; and they
had on their heads crowns of gold.^ [23] [39]
This brings us to the Horsemen in the Bible.
[image 40]Fig. 3. The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse.
Quote #18: The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse are described in the last book
of the New Testament of the Bible, called The Book of Revelation of Jesus
Christ to Saint John the Evangelist at 6:1-8. The chapter tells of a book or
scroll in Gods right hand that is sealed with seven seals. The Lamb of God, or
Lion of Judah (Jesus Christ), opens the first four of the seven seals, which
summons four beings that ride out on white, red, black, and pale horses.
Although some interpretations differ, in most accounts, the four riders are
seen as symbolizing Conquest, [1] War, [2] Famine, [3] and Death, respectively.
The Christian apocalyptic vision is that the four horsemen are to set a divine
apocalypse upon the world as harbingers of the Last Judgment.^ [24] [41]
It's suggested that Vishnu had (at the time the Vedas were written)
incarnated--or sent down an Avatar--twenty-two times in our history to function
as teachers in order to enlighten the masses. Jesus would be one of the last in
this series of avatars, and many people of many religions are now waiting for
another coming of such an Avatar (the biblical "Second Coming of Christ").
Vishnu, as we know, is En.ki, and therefore, it makes all the sense that Jesus
Christ would have been an Avatar of Vishnu/En.ki (as a side note--see how Jesus
is described as the Lion of Judah. What does the lion represent? It represents
the Sun. This is one of many references to Jesus being the "Sun God." Marduk,
perhaps more than En.ki, is described as the Sun god, but also notice when you
read the New Testament that Jesus has one calmer side and one more aggressive
side of himself. YHWH/Jehovah had the same "problem" in the OT. It's therefore
reasonable to assume that En.ki and his son were both acting as the same god/son
of God at different times).
Now, let us recapitulate this. What does all of this tell us? We have learned in
these papers that enlightenment is wisdom, and wisdom is related to the Owl and
the Serpent. Whom, then, are the Serpent and the Owl associated with? Well, the
Serpent is associated with Satan and/or Lucifer--the "Light-bringer" or
"Light-bearer" (light is information). The Owl is associated with both Marduk
and Isis. We have also seen that the lower lokas (Vedic Realms) are associated
with wisdom/enlightenment as well, being the dwelling place of all three of the
"Emissaries of Light"--En.ki, Marduk, and Ere?kigal; both in her Ere?kigal
persona and as the persona of Inanna/Isis, after she stole it (see Level IV).
III. In Summary: Who's the Father and King, and Who's in Charge of the Devas and
of the Asuras?
In the previous paper, we discussed the different groups of beings in the Veda
scriptures and where they belonged in the Hierarchy. Perhaps, the most important
ones to keep in mind are the Devas and the Asuras--they are the two groups who
allegedly are always at war with each other.
In order to remove the confusion on this subject, let me explain something. If
the reader goes on the Internet or begins reading books regarding ET races, you
will soon find all these different ET races who are combating each other (I've
brought this up before, but now I want to put another angle to it). There are a
few groups, such as the British Royal Family, still claiming the Divine
Feminine, and thus the Orion Empire (most of them unofficially), but the way
they have done their business over here, it's treason at best, and they have
since long been forbidden entry into Orion. We can sometimes see some of the
wars here on Earth being played out by opposing groups, wanting the same thing
but using different means to get there. Then we have the Vatican, of course, who
are Enkiites big time. Because of the Jesuits, they have infiltrated many
governments--particularly in the USA.
Albeit there are different factions of the AIF, working with different targets
instead of being totally united with each other, these are not the Devas and the
Asuras, which people may have thought. The Asuras are quite obviously the AIF in
general--case closed! The Devas, however, are a little more complicated to
explain, although it becomes obvious once it's done. To begin with--in the
ancient past--the Devas were the equivalent of Mother Goddess and Father God
(Queen of the Stars and Khan En.lil, although I believe that Khan En.lil has
never claimed to be "God;" he just naturally became looked upon as such because
of his relationship with the Queen). However, after the coup d?tat, we know that
the role of the Devas was taken over mainly by three deities--Lord Vishnu, Lord
Shiva (Marduk), and Kali (Queen Ere?kigal) (although Ishtar/Inanna/Isis played a
smaller role in it, too). They were the ones who then took over the positions as
the Creator(s) of the Universe, and although Queen Nin and Khan En.lil were
sometimes mentioned on rare occasions, the real power was designated to the AIF
leaders.
Therefore, the unholy trinity could be said to consist of En.ki, Marduk, and
Ere?kigal--they were the Devas. The rest of the AIF were the Asuras, in
conjunction with the lower deities and demons, also mentioned in the previous
paper. This is rather simplistic, but it works well for our purpose.
We know that there are different sects and cults within the Hindu religion, and
some worship Brahma, who often is equivalent to Lord Vishnu. Thus, in these
cases, Lord Vishnu is the Brahman--the first-born being in the Universe,
according to Vedic beliefs (although the original Brahman was Queen Nin, before
she was overthrown by Shiva/Marduk in the Battle of Tiamat). Now, to make it
just slightly more difficult, Lord Vishnu is not always on top of the
Pyramid--some sects and cults are strong Krishna worshipper, and as such, they
claim Lord Krishna on top of the Pyramid--thus being the Brahman. There are also
those who worship Shiva, and others are still worshippers of the Divine
Feminine.
For simplicity's sake, we are going to accept the most common denominator
regarding the belief amongst the Hindus, which is that Lord Vishnu is Brahma and
the Brahman--the Firstborn. This also corresponds with what we concluded in
Level IV--that Lord En.ki (Lucifer) is in charge of the AIF. In Hindu tradition,
this means that Lord Vishnu is the King of the Devas and the Asuras.
Sometimes we hear that Lord Shiva is in charge of the Devas and the Asuras, and
this has confused some people. However, there is a difference between being a
King, having enormous power over things, and being in direct charge of
everything. In this case, Lord Vishnu is the King but has delegated his
obligations down the line. In other words, he let his son, Lord Shiva, become
the Leader of the Devas and Asuras--the military General, as it were (as a side
note--has the reader noticed that Lord En.lil is not present in the Vedas; at
least not as far as I have seen. I am talking about Prince En.lil now, namely
Ninurta. This is most possibly because of what I told the reader in Level
IV--Prince Ninurta was not present on Earth very often after the coup
d'?tat--contrary to what Sitchin and others claim).
In conclusion and in simple terms--the Father and the King of the Devas and
Asuras is Lord Vishnu (En.ki), sometimes assuming the name of Kashyapa (and many
other names),^ [25] [42] and the Leader of the Devas and Asuras (I will call him
the General of the Devas and Asuras) is Lord Shiva (Marduk), sometimes assuming
the name of Indra (and other names).^ [26] [43] There is seemingly a constant
battle between the Devas and the Asuras, but in the big scheme of things, they
are on the same side, unless we are talking about Queen Nin and Khan En.lil as
being the Devas and the AIF being the Asuras, which would be the more correct
way of looking at it. However, this is not the way it's generally looked at in
the Hindu religion.
Interestingly enough, the ancient East Indian texts tell us that not only is
Lord Vishnu the Father of the Devas and the Asuras (the gods and semi-gods) but
also of all humanity.^ [27] [44] This, of course, is a direct link between Vishnu
and En.ki as being the same genetic engineer. This is not the only reference to
this fact, but I'd like to show the evidence--one evidence followed by
another--as they pop up in the context.
We have already showed that Vishnu and Kashyapa are one and the same--Kashyapa
also being an ancient Sage,^ [28] [45] full of wisdom, so they say (mostly
self-proclaimed, however). It is mostly under the alias Kashyapa as Lord Vishnu
is considered the father of humanity.
There is another related parallel in the Vedas, too. In the previous paragraph,
I mentioned that Lord Vishnu in the form of Kashyapa was also an ancient
Sage--and as Brahma, he was in charge of the Seven Rishis mentioned in the
Vedas. One of the important tasks the Rishis had was to write down history as it
was dictated by the Chief Sage, Vishnu, or the General, Shiva. The Pleiadians
are certainly not the only ones who say that there are different versions of the
ancient texts--one version that was meant for us humans to digest and consider
being our true history, and then the real history, which was only known to the
highest initiates of the secret societies and the Mystery Schools of old. The
real history is now hidden, and according to the Pleiadians, they are buried in
Antarctica, and other, for now, unreachable places for mankind.^ [29] [46]
^ [30] [47]
Conversely, there is a direct link between the Hindu "Seven Sages" and their
counterpart in the Sumerian texts:
Quote #19: The Apkallu (Akkadian) or Abgal, (Sumerian) are seven Sumerian
sages, demigods who are said to have been created by the god Enki (Akkadian:
Ea) to establish culture and give civilization to mankind. They served as
priests of Enki and as advisors or sages to the earliest kings or rulers of
Sumer before the flood. They are credited with giving mankind the Me (moral
code), the crafts, and the arts. They were seen as fish-like men who emerged
from the sweet water Abzu. They are commonly represented as having the lower
torso of a fish, or dressed as a fish.^ [31] [48]
This is useful information. Now we know who it was who wrote down our history on
the stone tablets and in cuneiform in ancient Sumer and Babylon as well as in
India before that. There still may have been a few humans who were assigned as
scribes as well, but the main duty of the scribes were Sages.
[image 49]Fig. 4. A bird-headed Apkallu on a relief at the palace of
Ashurnasirpal II; collection of the National Museum in Warsaw.
Moreover, the Akkadian Apkallu may have been fish-like men, just as some Avatars
of En.ki are described (read Poseidon, Oannes, and Neptune, etc.), but they were
apparently also bird-like, i.e. belonging to the "Aquatic Bird Tribe," which I
have claimed for so long now. More evidence to my claims are coming in my
direction (fig. 4). These kinds of evidence are hard to dispute.
Here are some more historical references to the Akkadian/Sumerian Sages:
Quote #20: The Apkallus are referred to in several Sumerian myths in cuneiform
literature. They are first referred to in the Erra Epic [4] by the character of
Marduk who asks Where are the Seven Sages of the Apsu, the pure puradu fish,
who just as their lord Ea, have been endowed with sublime wisdom? [5] According
to the Temple Hymn of Kuara, all seven sages are said to have originally
belonged to the city of Eridu. However, the names and order of appearance of
these seven sages are varied in different sources. They are also referred to
in the incantation series Bit Meseris third tablet. [6] In non-cuneiform
sources, they find references in the writings of Berossus, the 3rd century BC,
Babylonian priest of Bel Marduk. Berossus describes the appearance from the
Persian Gulf of the first of these sages Oannes and describes him as a monster
with two heads, the body of a fish and human feet. He then relates that more
of these monsters followed. The seven sages are also referred to in an
exorcistic text where they are described as bearing the likeness of
carps.^ [32] [50]
[image 51]Fig.5. The archeological mound of Eridu, the city where the seven
sages first appeared.
We have these strange-looking alien beings coming up from the ocean, teaching
humanity their own history, and written down by the Sages. They certainly must
have made an impression on the people who met them--who definitely believed they
were gods and therefore more eager to swallow the truths and the half-truths
this Aquatic Bird-Tribe was telling them. A similar thing most probably happened
in the Indian valley. The old saying that "history repeats itself" is certainly
appropriate to use here.
I will show much more evidence how different Vedic creatures correlate with the
Sumerian creatures and also which star systems and/or star constellations they
originate from. This also gives us great clues how these beings look like in
their "natural form," although they of course are shape-shifters and can take on
any shape and form they like. Nevertheless, we are going to see that what I will
call the Aquatic Bird-Tribe is quite dominant amongst the AIF conspirators,
although other types of beings are present as well.
IV. What Did All These Sailors See? Were They All Just Drunk, or are Mermaids
for Real???
What we notice more and more the deeper we research these star beings is that
many, if not most of them, are aquatic in nature. They are connected to water.
In the beginning, I was quite certain that this was just a metaphor and that the
ancient texts were just talking about the Cosmic Ocean as the "Sea." This is not
the case--these star beings are bird-like aquatic beings, and their three main
elements are the ether, water and air! Although the Cosmic Ocean metaphor
applies on occasion, I always had the feeling there was more to it, and this is
it!
I'm going to spend this section expanding on this concept, and I am going to use
available resources to do so. I have already made a jump start by discussing
En.ki and his connection with the Bird Tribe and him living in the Sea in his
different Sumerian counterparts, or Avatars. Later on, we'll see that his Vedic
counterparts have connection to water as well, but we are going to start at
another end and work the way there, just to eventually end up in another paper
that will bring up the issue further.
We were discussing Jesus in Section II above, so let's do a light start there,
and that will bring us to the real issue. Our trail begins in Greek, with the
Goddess Semiramis.
Quote #21: According to the legend as related by Diodorus, Semiramis was of
noble parents, the daughter of the fish-goddess Derketo of Ascalon in Syria
and a mortal. Derketo abandoned her at birth and drowned herself. Doves fed
the child until Simmas, the royal shepherd, found and raised her.^ [33] [52]
Each tradition, be it Greek, Roman, Sumerian, Vedic, or whatever, has its own
specific story details that are unique for that tradition, but the main stories
across the board often correlate. Here we see again how the Greek mythology
talks about a fish-goddess (water), but also about doves that fed her as a child
(bird). Where else have we heard of doves? Let's take a look at the Bible.
Matthew 3:16.
Quote #22: As soon as Jesus was baptized, he went up out of the water. At that
moment heaven was opened, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove
and alighting on him.^ [34] [53]
Interesting how in one single Bible verse, both the water and the bird are
mentioned. Here, God is the metaphor of a dove. Now, unusually for these papers,
we're going to move to Syria, and a Syrian legend.
Quote #23: Atargatis /?'t?r??t?s/ or Ataratheh (/?'taer?th?/; Aramaic:
'Atar'atheh or Tar'atheh?) was a Syrian deity, the chief goddess of northern
Syria (Michael Rostovtzeff called her the great mistress of the North Syrian
lands), Ctesias also used the name Derceto for her. and to the Romans as Dea
Syriae (Syrian goddess). Primarily she was a goddess of fertility, but, as the
baalat (mistress) of her city and people, she was also responsible for their
protection and well-being. Her chief sanctuary was at Hierapolis, modern
Manbij, northeast of Aleppo, Syria. She is sometimes described as a
mermaid-goddess, because of a fish-bodied goddess at Ascalon. However, there
is no evidence that Atargatis was worshipped at Ascalon, and all iconographic
evidence shows her as anthropomorphic.^ [35] [54]
We also saw a reference to Derceto (Derketo) in Quote #21, in Greek mythology.
Here, in Syria, she is primarily a "goddess of fertility" and also a goddess of
protection. However, here is an interesting line from Quote #23: "She is
sometimes described as a mermaid-goddess, because of a fish-bodied goddess at
Ascalon." The next sentence says that there is no evidence that Atargatis was
worshipped at Ascalon, but as I just showed in Quote #21, the same thing is
mentioned in the Greek legend. Let us look up the definition of mermaid:
Quote #24: A mermaid is a legendary aquatic creature with the upper body of a
female human and the tail of a fish. Mermaids appear in the folklore of many
cultures worldwide, including the Near East, Europe, Africa and Asia. The
first stories appeared in ancient Assyria, in which the goddess Atargatis
transformed herself into a mermaid out of shame for accidentally killing her
human lover. Mermaids are sometimes associated with perilous events such as
floods, storms, shipwrecks and drownings. In other folk traditions (or
sometimes within the same tradition), they can be benevolent or beneficent,
bestowing boons or falling in love with humans.^ [36] [55]
[image 56]Fig. 6. A mermaid. Keep in mind her red hair for later reference.
For the records, mermen (male mermaids) exist as well in the old legends, but we
don't hear very much about them in these terms, but they would be the mermaids'
male counterpart, of course. We hear about Poseidon being a fish-man (merman) at
times, as well as Oannes, En.ki, and their counterpart--En.ki, who always has
been equated to water. Aquarius, the water sign, is En.ki's astrological sign.
However, when I mention mermen, I'm more thinking about creatures who swim in
the ocean, being observed by fishermen and sailors in general--more commonly
centuries ago.
Now, let us return to Atargatis, where we left out in Quote #23.
Quote #25: Her [Atargatis' or Ataratheh's] consort is usually Hadad. As
Ataratheh, doves and fish were considered sacred by her, doves as an emblem of
the Love-Goddess, and fish as symbolic of the fertility and life of the
waters. According to a third-century Syriac source, In Syria and in Urh?i
[Edessa] the men used to castrate themselves in honor of Taratha. But when
King Abgar became a believer, he commanded that anyone who emasculated himself
should have a hand cut off. And from that day to the present no one in Urh?i
emasculates himself anymore.^ [37] [57]
This is another reference to a very insane part of humanity's history. Just as I
told the reader in Level IV how the monks used to castrate themselves in order
to follow their "cause," after En.ki was castrated himself by his brother,
Ninurta, and became a "goddess," men in Syria did the same thing, until a
reasonably sane king put an end to it. It's a sad event that mankind is so
easily misled that they are willing to do anything to please those who have put
themselves as authority or because of religion. In the case of the latter,
people often did it voluntarily, while in the case of obeying a king, they
mostly did it out of fear.
Anyway, here we also have a reference to Hadad, being Atargatis' consort and
fish and doves being sacred animals. As we look back at our more correct ancient
history, we start seeing a pattern--these two animals, being fish and
doves--were often sacred in certain parts of the world. We have also seen a
relationship between Jesus and the dove. Now, let's look at Hadad in order to
eventually narrow this down to show the reader my point.
Quote #26: Hadad (Ugaritic Haddu) is a Northwest Semitic storm and rain god,
cognate in name and origin with the earlier attested East Semitic Akkadian
(Assyrian-Babylonian) god Adad. Hadad was also called Pidar, Rapiu,
Baal-Zephon, or often simply Ba?al (Lord), but this title was also used for
other gods. The bull was the symbolic animal of Hadad. He appeared bearded,
often holding a club and thunderbolt while wearing a bull-horned headdress.
Hadad was equated with the Indo-European Nasite Hittite storm-god Teshub; the
Egyptian god Set; the Greek god Zeus; and the Roman god Jupiter, as Jupiter
Dolichenus.^ [38] [58]
Now we start getting more evidence as of who is who. Hadad is related to being a
storm and rain god--in Babylon also known as Adad (whom we mentioned in Level IV
in relation to the Great Deluge). Hadad is further associated with the Bull
(Taurus/the Pleiades), the thunderbolt, and wearing a bull-horned headdress. In
Egypt he was known as Set, in Greece as Zeus, and in Rome as Jupiter. We can
hardly get any clearer and more solid references to Utu Shamash a.k.a. Lord
Marduk. Then, if Hadad/Marduk is the male counterpart of Atargatis, she must be
Inanna/Ishtar/Isis. This, of course, was already hinted at when the texts
started mentioning "fertility goddess," although fertility goddess can also be
applied to Ere?kigal.
There is more:
Quote #27: As a consequence of the first half of the name, Atargatis has
frequently, though wrongly, been identified as 'Ashtart. [16] The two deities
were probably of common origin and have many features in common, but their
cults are historically distinct.^ [39] [59]
[...]
...she appeared repeatedly with her consort, Hadad, and in the richly
syncretic religious culture at Dura-Europos, was worshipped as Artemis
Azzanathkona. [20] Two well preserved temples in Niha, Lebanon are dedicated to
her and to Hadad. In the 1930s, numerous Nabatean bas-relief busts of
Atargatis were identified by Nelson Glueck at Khirbet et-Tann?r, Jordan, in
temple ruins of the early first century CE; [21] there the lightly veiled
goddesss lips and eyes had once been painted red, and a pair of fish
confronted one another above her head. Her wavy hair, suggesting water to
Glueck, was parted in the middle. At Petra the goddess from the north was
syncretised with a North Arabian goddess from the south al-Uzzah, worshipped
in the one temple. At Dura-Europus among the attributes of Atargatis are the
spindle and the sceptre or fish-spear.^ [40] [60]
[...]
Not unnaturally she is identified with the Greek Aphrodite. By the conjunction
of these many functions, despite originating as a sea deity analogous to
Amphitrite, she becomes ultimately a great nature-goddess, analogous to Cybele
and Rhea: In one aspect she typifies the protection of water in producing
life; in another, the universal of other-earth; in a third (influenced, no
doubt, by Chaldean astrology), the power of Destiny.^ [41] [61]
Here we have a reference to Aphrodite, whom I earlier equated with Inanna and
her aliases in different cultures, just to eventually land in Egypt as Isis. A
pair of fish confronted each other above Atargatis' hair (again, it makes me
think of the Pope's fish hat). Inevitably, as this trail of evidence that keeps
pouring in like stormy water (no pun intended), it leads us to Arabia and the
Middle East, but also to Nigeria in Africa and the Yoruba Religion. So, bear
with me here--the evidence is overwhelming.
Quote #28: In the Yor?b? religion, ??ng? (also spelled Sango, Shango; often
known as Xang? or Chang? in Latin America and the Caribbean; and also known as
Jakuta) (from =shan, to strike) is perhaps one of the most popular Orisha;
also known as the god of fire, lightning and thunder. Shango is historically a
royal ancestor of the Yoruba as he was the third king of the Oyo Kingdom prior
to his posthumous deification. In the Lukum? (Olokun mi = my dear one)
religion of the Caribbean, Shango is considered the center point of the
religion as he represents the Oyo people of West Africa, the symbolic
ancestors of the adherents of the faith. All the major initiation ceremonies
(as performed in Cuba, Trinidad, Puerto Rico and Venezuela for the last few
hundred years) are based on the traditional Shango ceremony of Ancient Oyo.
This ceremony survived the Middle Passage and is considered to be the most
complete to have arrived on Western shores. This variation of the Yoruba
initiation ceremony became the basis of all Orisha initiations in the
West.^ [42] [62]
Shango, as a god of fire, lighting and thunder, can now, without having to
provide tons of evidence, easily be equated with Marduk and his West African
connections (and when it comes to Africa--not only Egypt).
Now, after the introduction to the West African culture is made, let's continue:
Quote #29: Following Oduduwa, Oranyan and Ajaka, Sango (or Jakuta) was the
third Alafin (king) of Oyo. In Professor Masons mythological account of heroes
and kings, contrary to his peaceful brother Ajaka, he was a powerful and even
violent ruler. Moreover, he is said to have had supernatural forces because he
could produce thunder and lightning. He reigned for seven years, the whole of
which period was marked by his continuous campaigns and his many battles. The
end of his reign resulted from his own inadvertent destruction of his palace
by lightning. During his lifetime, He was married to three wives namely Osun,
Oba and Oya. Oya (who is his favorite) was a mystical creature who can
transform into human form although is basically an animal.^ [43] [63]
So, Shango (Sango) had three wives--please keep this in mind as we move on to
the Arabic/Islamic mythology (my emphasis is in italics, as usual).
Quote #30: Al-Uzz? (Arabic: ?????? al-?Uzz? [al ?uzza:]) was one of the three
chief goddesses of Arabian religion in pre-Islamic times and was worshiped as
one of the daughters of Allah by the pre-Islamic Arabs along with All?t and
Man?t. Al-'Uzz? was also worshipped by the Nabataeans, who equated her with
the Greek goddess Aphrodite Ourania (Roman Venus Caelestis). A stone cube at
a?-??'if (near Mecca) was held sacred as part of her cult. She is mentioned in
the Quran Sura 53:19 as being one of the goddesses that people
worshiped.^ [44] [64]
[...]
Al-'Uzz?s presence in South Arabia has been thoroughly effaced by time but her
presence has not been obliterated far north at Petra of the Nabataeans, who
had deities with Arabian names early in their history, whom they later
associated with Hellenistic gods, al-'Uzz? becoming associated with Isis and
with Aphrodite.Excavations at Petra since 1974 have revealed a temple,
apparently dedicated to Isis/al-'Uzz?, now named after some carvings found
inside, the Temple of the Winged Lions (Hammond). Inscriptions record the name
of al-'Uzz? at Petra.^ [45] [65]
[image 66]Fig. 7. The goddess Al-Uzz?. Note the two fish above her head.
Here, in the South Arabian, pre-Islamic/Islamic texts, we have another reference
to Aphrodite/Isis/Inanna/Ishtar. Again, we have two fish symbols on top of her
head, referring to her aquatic nature (fig. 7). Also, instead of having three
wives, the Chief Deity, Allah, has three daughters, whereof Al-Uzz? is one (see
my italic emphasis in the first paragraph of Quote #30 above). Let's examine
All?t, being one of these three daughters (my emphasis in italics).
Quote #31: Especially in older sources, Allat is an alternative name of the
Mesopotamian goddess of the underworld, now usually known as Ereshkigal. She
was reportedly also venerated in Carthage under the name Allatu.^ [46] [67]
[image 68]Fig. 8. All?t/Minerva/Ere?kigal. Statue of the 2nd century AD from
As-Suwayda, Syria (Roman province). National Museum of Damascus
We are now starting to come full circle, returning to the Underworld and Queen
Ere?kigal of old Mesopotamia/Sumer/Babylon. Let's continue with All?t,
collecting even more evidence:
Quote #32: The goddess occurs in early Safaitic graffiti (Safaitic han-Il?t
the Goddess) and the Nabataeans of Petra and the people of Hatra also
worshipped her, equating her with the Greek Athena and Tyche and the Roman
Minerva. She is frequently called the Great Goddess in Greek in multi-lingual
inscriptions. According to Wellhausen, the Nabataeans believed al-L?t was the
mother of Hubal (and hence the mother-in-law of Man?t).
The Greek historian Herodotus, a writer of the 5th century BC, also considered
her being the equivalent of Aphrodite:
The Assyrians call Aphrodite Mylitta, the Arabians Alilat [Greek spelling:
?lilat], and the Persians Mithra. In addition that deity is associated with
the Indian deity Mitra.^ [47] [69]
All these cultures (Rome, Greece, Sumer, South Arabia, Egypt, West Africa, etc.)
believed that this goddess was either the greatest of them all, or one or the
greatest. The ancient Egyptians, for example, did not think that the Underworld
was something bad--it was part of the afterlife process. The Book of the Dead,
for example, does not look at the Underworld as a negative place--it describes
it as a guideline for the soul, finding herself in a place of options and
opportunities after the death of the shell (the body). The soul of the dead
person could continue her journey in a direction that suited her the most in
order to evolve in a more rapid pace. Little did they know that this was (and
is) a great deception, and ultimately leads directly into the AIF's dimension of
"recycling of souls."
In addition to what we've mentioned thus far regarding Ere?kigal, En.ki, and
Marduk, by looking at the above quotes, we can conclude the following: we have
established Queen Ere?kigal's link across the different cultures--she is the
counterpart of Minerva in Rome and Athena in Greece. En.ki, who is equated with
being Ere?kigal's consort in the Underworld, took many wives--something we knew
since earlier--and we have showed additional evidence that Marduk is sometimes
intertwined with his father, En.ki--especially when we touch the Underworld
subject.
Let us re-examine Ere?kigal's Greek counterpart, in order to make the circle
complete.
Quote #33: Although Athena appears before Zeus at Knossos -- in Linear B, as
..., a-ta-na po-ti-ni-ja, "Mistress Athena" -- in the Classical Olympian
pantheon, Athena was remade as the favorite daughter of Zeus, born fully armed
from his forehead. The story of her birth comes in several versions. In the
one most commonly cited, Zeus lay with Metis, the goddess of crafty thought
and wisdom, but he immediately feared the consequences. It had been prophesied
that Metis would bear children more powerful than the sire, even Zeus himself.
In order to forestall these dire consequences, after lying with Metis, Zeus
"put her away inside his own belly"; he "swallowed her down all of a sudden".
He was too late: Metis had already conceived.^ [48] [70]
The above text is interesting even if standing alone by itself--it shows the
Divine Male giving birth to the Divine Female, which is the opposite of the
truth; another masquerade of the Patriarchal Regime.
Now consider this: if Athena is equated to All?t and Ere?kigal, and All?t is one
of Allah's daughters, would Zeus then be Allah's counterpart? We are once again
back to En.ki and Marduk (I sometimes think of En.ki as Marduk Sr. and En.ki's
son as Marduk Jr. The same think could be said about Zeus--on most parts, Zeus
is equated with Marduk [Jr.], but on occasion, he is equated with En.ki,
although that doesn't make sense in a broader perspective when we look at the
Pantheon. Zeus clearly is a "younger god," i.e. one of those who "came
after"--one of the Invaders.)
Then, if we go back to Semiramis and her link to Isis, a certain picture starts
to emerge, perhaps. Many are waiting for a male "Messiah" to come down to save
mankind--many even say that this Messiah will be either En.ki or Marduk.
However, could it be that the AIF is pulling our legs in a way very few people
have thought of? Could it be that people are waiting for someone whom they don't
expect? Maybe the "Anti-Christ" is still a male (Marduk), but if the following
is the case, the Universe has once and for all lost the heir of the Throne of
the Orion Empire. Consider this: the Dove is a (Divine) Feminine symbol. If we
then take Semiramis and her counterpart, Isis, into consideration, we have, not
a male Messiah, but a female!
Wes Penre, Thursday, August 21, 2014
Disclaimer!
The purpose for this series of papers, as with anything and everything I have
been writing, is to express my own conclusions, based on the research I have
done. It must in no way be considered the ultimate truth and must not be
considered anybody else's truth until that person has thoroughly thought these
things through and decided that he or she may agree with what I have concluded,
in part or as a whole. If somebody does not agree, it must be that person's
right to individual thinking.
Moreover, I do not want any religion, cult, secret society, or followers to be
created out of my material. Also, I am not a guru or a leader of any kind, and I
refuse to be treated or viewed as such. At the most, I am a student of the
unknown and the mystics who wants to teach and share my experiences and the
knowledge I think that I have gained.
Thank you,
[image 71]
^ [1] [72] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ganesha [73]
^ [2] [74] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ganesha#Etymology_and_other_names [75]
^ [3] [76] http://www.preceptaustin.org/jehovah_sabaoth_-_lord_of_hosts.htm [77]
^ [4] [78] Is 31:4, 5-note
^ [5] [79] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nergal#Attributes [80]
^ [6] [81] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo#Etymology [82]
^ [7] [83] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abaddon [84]
^ [8] [85] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shesha [86]
^ [9] [87] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narayana [88]
^ [10] [89] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patala [90]
^ [11] [91] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophia_(Gnosticism) [92]
^ [12] [93] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisdom#Others [94]
^ [13] [95] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrikas [96]
^ [14] [97] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakshmi [98]
^ [15] [99] As noted in a previous level, enlightenment is initially related to
Prince Ninurta (En.lil), from where the word enlightenment stems from
(EN [LIL]ightenment).
^ [16] [100] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakshmi#Iconography [101]
^ [17] [102] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakshmi#Etymology [103]
^ [18] [104] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakshmi#Names [105]
^ [19] [106] http://www.sanatansociety.org/hindu_gods_and_goddesses/lakshmi.htm#.U
_ANXGMlpgg [107]
^ [20] [108] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rishabha_%28Hinduism%29 [109]
^ [21] [110] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rishabha [111]
^ [22] [112] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tirthankara [113]
^ [23] [114] KJV, "Authorized Version," Cambridge Edition, 1611, "Book of
Revelation 4:4," op. cit.
^ [24] [115] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Horsemen_of_the_Apocalypse [116]
^ [25] [117] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asura#Accounts [118]
^ [26] [119] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asura#Characteristics [120]
^ [27] [121] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manu_%28Hinduism%29#Genealogy [122]
^ [28] [123] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kashyapa [124]
^ [29] [125] Pleiadian Lecture, Mars 2014.
^ [30] [126] In fact, just recently, they have found civilizations buried under
the ice of Antarctica, and they are currently working on digging in out as best
as they can.
^ [31] [127] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apkallu [128]
^ [32] [129] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apkallu#Historical_references [130]
^ [33] [131] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiramis#Biography_according_to_Diodoru
s_Siculus [132]
^ [34] [133] KJV Version, Matthew 3:16, http://biblehub.com/matthew/3-16.htm [134]
^ [35] [135] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atargatis [136]. Also, as a side note,
when we look up these "mythological" gods and goddesses--particularly in
Wikipedia--we see references to rock bands as well with the same names; often in
the genre of heavy metal or death metal. This is a totally different subject,
but these band members are not ignorant--they know quite a lot about the occult,
and the different mythologies of the world. They use their knowledge to mind
control and to distract the masses. That is what the music industry is all
about--their sole purpose; and to make tons of money, of course...
^ [36] [137] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mermaid [138]
^ [37] [139] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atargatis [136]
^ [38] [140] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadad [141]
^ [39] [142] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atargatis#Cult_centers_and_images [143]
^ [40] [144] Ibid.
^ [41] [145] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atargatis#Syncretism [146]
^ [42] [147] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shango [148]
^ [43] [149] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shango#Historical_Sango [150]
^ [44] [151] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-%E2%80%98Uzz%C3%A1 [152]
^ [45] [153] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-%E2%80%98Uzz%C3%A1#Cult_of_al-.E2.80.
98Uzz.C3.A1 [154]
^ [46] [155] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allat#Descriptions [156]
^ [47] [157] Ibid. Italic not in original.
^ [48] [158] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athena#Olympian_version [159]
Links:
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- image
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- image
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- image
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- image
- link
- image
- link
- link
- link
- link
- image
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- image
- link
- image
- link
- link
- image
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link
- link