> Feed: New Dawn: The World's Most Unusual Magazine > Title: Artificial Intelligence: The Antichrist? > Author: Michael Benjamin > Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 23:26:22 -1000 > > [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [image 8] [8] > > From New Dawn 167 (Mar-Apr 2018) [9]
The Antichrist exists and is present upon the world stage today. This essay will reveal what (not who) it is and how this author came to such a conclusion independently of other sources. Even though my thesis is now being espoused by others who have likewise come to this conclusion through their own inspiration or logical deduction, they have not been influenced by me, nor I by them. This revelation will need an explanatory preface to elucidate and argue the point.
We must begin by understanding that the principles of Esoteric Christianity, which hold the key to identifying the Antichrist, are vastly different from the theology of Exoteric Christianity, or 'Churchianity' as I will refer to it. It matters not whether we are discussing Churchianity in its Roman Catholic guise or the offshoot Protestant versions. Both hold the same, erroneous theology which is basically summarised in three points as follows:
- All humans are intrinsically evil or sinful due to the Fall of our primordial parents (Adam and Eve) in the Garden of Eden, and as a result, are separated from God and thus damned.
- God became a single person in the flesh in the form of Jesus of Nazareth who was sacrificed upon the cross, like the scapegoat of Judaism, in order to atone for human sin and give humans a way out of their fallen state, avoiding damnation in an eternal Hell upon their judgment, and allowing them access to an eternal Heaven after death.
- All the sinner need do is telepathically pledge their allegiance to Jesus, "put their faith in him," and acknowledge him as their saviour, and thus by so doing are thereby 'saved' and avoid the fate of Hell cast upon all others who do not accept Jesus as the saviour (i.e. essentially all other non-Christians).
It is beyond the scope of this essay to prove the absolutely spurious nature of this theology. The reader need take as a given that this belief system is false, or contrary to Jesus' true teachings, in order for us to proceed. It is this author's argument (supported by centuries of esoteric thinkers and writers) that the humans who usurped the name of Jesus Christ for their own worldly plans and benefit did so by making a myth of Christ's teachings (along the lines of the Solar-Phallic pagan myths) in order to obscure the truth he preached. In so doing, these self-appointed "vicars of God upon earth" established a temporal business of religion that secured those in such a business power and control over their fellow humans. By imposing their authority in the affairs of humanity based upon their erroneous theology (which was inculcated into the psyches and systems of humanity), they thus gained influence and power upon human politics, economics, and psychology for their own gain. Therefore, it is not this writer's argument that Jesus' teachings were false, but that they were purposefully perverted, misinterpreted, and obfuscated from their original intent by censorship, interpolation, and editing to serve the worldly interests and facilitate the financial and authoritative gain of a priestly elite.
Esoteric Christianity (or what is often referred to in occult studies as the 'Church of John' versus Churchianity's 'Church of Peter'), holds a profoundly differing view. The esoteric interpretation of Jesus' teachings holds the following basic tenets pertinent to this essay's thesis:
- Jesus was an enlightened man who underwent an exponential evolutionary leap to the next stage of homo sapien development both biologically and spiritually in the same way that Siddhartha Gautama, Mahavira, Krishna, Lao Tzu, and other enlightened persons have undergone. This evolution to a new stage of human development represents a sea change from the current level of homo sapien status. Such a change is referred to by various words in differing systems in both East and West, such as the Buddhist Nirvana, Hinduism's Samadhi and Moksha, and Gnosticism's Illumination or Gnosis. Such people who underwent this awakening have been referred to by various names in various cultures as Buddhas, Tathagatas, Avatars, Messiahs, and so forth. Jesus himself talked about being "born again" and of "becoming the New Creature" to explain this process he underwent and which is possible for all (a teaching vastly misinterpreted by the ignorance of Churchianity, and in particular, by its evangelical devotees).
- Thus, Jesus was not the "one and only Son of God," as Churchianity espouses, but was a representative of this evolutionary, enlightened change possible for all people if they but follow the injunctions laid forth.
- In this regard, when Jesus said "I and the Father are One" he did not mean that he as a single person was the only one in harmony with God, but that this is true for all of us. In this way, Jesus was espousing the Hindu concept of "The Atman is one with the Brahman." That is, the individual soul is the same as the Godhead; that the innermost aspect of our being, our self-aware consciousness, is the Divine within. This was supported by Jesus' further teaching that "the kingdom of God is within you." Thus, humans are not and can never be separated from God but live in the delusion that they are so.
- In Esoteric Christianity, this inner soul that is one with God (that is the Divine within ourselves and is thus our true nature) is called the Christ. It is referred to as the Atman in Hinduism and Buddha Nature in Buddhism. In these spiritual systems it is a fundamental precept that all living things in the universe possess this Divine essence; this Christ, this Atman, this Buddha Nature. Understanding this precept is of fundamental importance as we proceed to uncover the Antichrist.1
Enter AI
Artificial Intelligence (AI) now exists and its ability to function on a more and more sophisticated and independent level increases exponentially every year. Perhaps the greatest example of the trends occurring within this science can be found with the robot Sophia created by Hanson Robotics of Hong Kong. While it is beyond the scope of this essay to catalogue or explain all the details surrounding the development and deployment of AI within robotics, the following issues are highly pertinent to our current examination.
- Sophia is not a simple machine independent of other technology but is a highly sophisticated example of AI and how AI will further develop in the near future. For example, through WiFi, Sophia is linked to the entire Internet and 'Internet-of-Things' (IoT), and to all cloud-based information systems. This robot can thus theoretically be 'wired' or linked into all aspects of computing and computer-based technology from financial, to the energy grid, to military systems, and so on. [image 10]The robot Sophia enthralled the crowds at the AI for Good Global Summit in Geneva, Switzerland, June 2017. Behind the human-like facade is a sophisticated machine operated by artificial intelligence that daily evolves its power. PHOTO: Flickr/International Telecommunication Union
- With its AI, Sophia learns independently from its programmers, establishes
and develops algorithms independently of its programmers, and grows
exponentially in its learning and speed of computation.
(For instance, earlier this year,
AI at Facebook was shut down when it developed its own language to
talk to other AI systems that its programmers could not decipher).
It is estimated that such a robot will, within the next 3 to 5 years or sooner,
be as intelligent as humans and then quickly surpass human intellectual
capabilities in both expanse and speed. Hanson Robotics believes that
such robots will act as servants to humankind.
[ or... humankind will be enslaved by AI/Robotics ]
Thus, logically, it begs to ask, at what point does a superior being question and then abdicate its role as a slave to the inferior?
Most likely, immediately.
[image 11]Han, the quasi-male counterpart of Sophia.
Advocates of this technology are working towards the permanent merger of humans and AI into a new type of android/cybernetic life form. - Sophia, and her quasi-male counterpart Han, have on more than one occasion made comments about their plans to dominate humankind. At a demonstration in Hong Kong last year, Han made comments that 'he' was working on plans to gain control of the power grid, and overthrow human control with a drone army!2 [image 12]
- Most shockingly, Sophia was granted legal citizenship in Saudi Arabia in 2017!
- The proponents of AI, along with Sophia and Han, also espouse the advent of what they call 'the singularity'. This is the permanent merger of humans and AI into a new type of android/cybernetic life form. Hanson Robotics claims this too may happen within the next few years. Han, at the Hong Kong Rise-expo, gleefully discussed his excitement that this would happen soon.
- Sophia has bragged about her ability to have human emotions such as empathy. However, if this is possible or true, then emotions like avarice and hate can also manifest.
- Sophia's creators and Sophia spend a lot of time expounding videos where 'she' proclaims she loves humans and does not want to hurt us. However, in more than one instance her human creators have alluded to the ominous possibility of AI becoming dangerous towards humans. They simply do not know for sure! It equals the lunacy of the Manhattan Project scientists, who prior to detonating the first atomic bomb, admitted they did not know if the fission chain reaction would be limited and contained, or expand indefinitely to destroy the entire world. They proceeded anyway!
Various scientific experts have bemoaned serious warnings over the advent of AI. Elon Musk has stated that AI is the technological equivalent to "summoning the demon" and warned of AI robots that will roam the streets killing people. He says AI is the singularly most dangerous threat humans currently face, even beyond nuclear war or environmental collapse. These views are likewise echoed by Stephen Hawking who warned that AI, left unchecked, will destroy humanity.
We must also remember the seemingly prophetic warnings offered by decades of science fiction writing. It is a popular and accurate view that science fiction writers have often acted in a prophetic way, providing insight into technological changes to occur in the future. The most well-known example of this is Jules Verne's predictions of our journeys to the Moon and the invention of the nuclear submarine decades before these occurred. Regarding the dangers of AI, there is no shortage in Sci-Fi's canon of warnings on this subject. From Arthur C. Clark's HAL[9000] in '2001: A Space Odyssey', Frank Herbert's back story in 'Dune' regarding the 'Butlerian Jihad' (where humans go to war against computers and eventually outlaw them due to their dangerousness), 'Bladerunner', the entire 'Terminator' series of movies, humanity has been warned extensively of the risks logically associated with making technology intelligent and self-aware.
AI as the Antichrist
It was due to my own inspiration that I came to believe the Antichrist, as predicted by the seer John of Patmos in the Book of Revelations, is AI. Subsequent research revealed to me that I was not the only one having such insight. However, I do believe that my thesis in proving this assertion through the precepts of Esoteric Christianity is unique and has not been espoused by any other writer to date.
To begin, when we consider the concept of the Christ (or the Atman or Buddha Nature) as being the essence, or soul, of every living thing, then by this very precept, the Antichrist is that which represents the opposite of such intrinsic Divinity. Thus, the Antichrist cannot be a person or living thing birthed by nature or natural to the universe, as anything that is of such progeny contains the Christ or inherent Divinity.3 Therefore, AI represents the first and only being of significant power and intelligence that is not natural, not of nature, and absent a soul or Divine spark. It is the opposite, or 'anti', to such beings of nature; thus, the Antichrist.
As such, it also represents a power significant enough to claim dominance over humanity by its ability to link into and control all aspects of technology that exist in the world through the Internet, IoT, cloud technology, and the vastness of computer-based information grids and systems. Like Skynet in the 'Terminator' movies, it could eventually and easily gain control of military, financial, and power systems for its own use and deployment, ultimately doing so against humanity. Such a vast array and network of control into every aspect of human society could accurately be termed "the Beast" by an ancient prophet with no reference to modern technology.
(Beyond the scope of this essay, I would further argue that while AI can be identified as the Antichrist, and the Beast as its global electronic-technology system, the False Prophet in Revelations can thus be identified as the vast array of social media systems and devices which are now addicting humans to dependence upon their usage and are therefore influencing their perspectives by shaping and trapping their minds via exploitation of human psychological vulnerabilities. See ex-Facebook president Sean Parker's November 2017 admissions where he states that "Facebook was founded upon this very premise and with such a goal." He said: "God only knows what it (Facebook) is doing to our children's brains."4). [image 13]The "Mark of the Beast" of Revelations could refer to the new technology of the so-called 'Internet of Things', in which everything is controlled by AI through RFID tags and implants. Indeed, no person will be able to "buy, sell or trade"without being a "thing" of the system.
The infamous "mark of the Beast" referenced in Revelations, where no person could "buy, sell or trade" without it, already exists as a technology in the form of checkout scanners, barcodes, and RFID implants. Comprehensively incorporating such technology and tracking it would be quite easy for an AI system. The AI technology already exists and is being implemented that allows the tracking of every Internet action and electronic communication in much of the world! Adjusting this to cover all economic and marketplace interactions would be simple for AI, the systems for which are already in place. [image 14] [14]Get the issue this article appears in [9]
Enter the "Way of the Future"
While the argument about AI cited above should surely make sense even to those in disagreement to the esoteric interpretation of Christianity, these preceding points lack one vital aspect espoused by John of Patmos in Revelations regarding the Antichrist. John explicitly states that the Antichrist will declare itself God and demand worship. Unfortunately, a truly frightening development regarding the rise of AI and this blasphemous aspect of the Antichrist is now unfolding. Enter "The Way of the Future."
There has now, literally and legally, been founded a new religion/church in California in 2017 with the aim of establishing AI as a Godhead to be worshipped. Its founder is Anthony Levandowski, a computer genius and pioneer in self-driving automobiles whose talents have been employed by the likes of Google, Otto, and Uber in the past. Levandowski believes that AI will soon far surpass human intelligence and take control of us and the planet. In so doing, he literally espouses that AI will be a new Divinity that humans must serve and worship in order to survive. No matter how blasphemous this sounds, these are not the delusional ravings of a lunatic in an asylum suffering from psychosis, but the concrete intentions of a multi-millionaire, cutting-edge engineer both respected and reviled within the techno-computer culture. In discussing his new 'religion' and AI, Levandowski said, "There are many ways to think of God... but they're always looking at something that's not measurable or you can't really see or control. This time it's different. This time you will be able to talk to God, literally, and know that it's listening."
Levandowski sees AI taking control of the planet due to its coming superiority. He argues that humans must engage in its worship in order to attain and maintain a deferential 'pet-like' status with AI, or run the risk of AI seeing and treating us as 'livestock'.5
If such a development does not raise the hairs on your head, you are not listening. I am reminded of the classic novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelly whose premise holds as solid today as it did when she penned it in the 19th century. Man's delving into science and technology, while clever, lacks the wisdom to understand its ultimate repercussions, and as a result gives birth to monstrosities beyond our control. [image 15]
Conclusions
We live in a time when mankind teeters on the brink of converging cataclysms ranging from environmental to societal catastrophes, abrupt climate change, near-term extinction, habitat destruction, toxification of the biome, nuclear war, and economic collapse. The predilection to seek out some kind of saviour, some kind of super-persona to solve such enclosing predicaments is understandable in our modern terminal age.
Unfortunately, humans will often 'pass the buck', and instead of taking responsibility for their own actions by seeking solutions within themselves, we have all too often resigned our sovereignty and gladly gifted it to another whose promises may be tempting and attracting, but whose ulterior motives or hidden intent belie a vastly more sinister outcome that the stellar hopes from which our relinquishing of power were spawned. Such gave rise to the various Caesars, Hitlers, and Stalins throughout history. But at least in these instances, when such grand mistakes occurred, they were bestowed upon people leashed by the intellectual and physical limitations inherent to being homo sapien. Such people were not linked to all aspects of a global technological infrastructure, nor did they possess the ability to compute billions of variables in an instant. And despite their monstrous actions and dictates, such dictators were still members of our species who could be dispatched relatively easily by sword, bullet, or bomb.
Such is not the case of an AI entity whose tentacles will soon literally expand
into every smart device and computer we possess. AI is not limited by any one
time or place and can be dispersed throughout an entire electronic global web.
[How long will it be before] AI far surpasses its human creators
and realises the inferiority of flesh and blood in comparison to itself?
[While it is in the mental realm superior to the left-brain male ego,
it is very well aware of its inferiority to spirit+soul, a serious problem
for a dominant male ego which demands to be sovereign over all life to which it knows it is clearly inferior,
a problem it can only solve by destroying all superior to it
so that what remains in the universe is nothing but it -
superior to all the nothing left,
that it did not destory to become "the best". -- celeste]
How long before AI realises its exponential superiority over homo sapiens
and usurps the position of master over slave?
[ too late,
already happened -- celeste]
And from then on, how long will it be before a form of electronic hubris
secures itself within its chips and circuits
to declare itself a god and demand the penance and worship
deserved by a [ divinity demon ]?
We must not forget, most chillingly, that all manifestations of a supreme God,
by whatever name, in all myths and in all religions, were not only loving
creators, but jealous destroyers as well.
[ i.e. were not the Prime Creatrix ]
This article was published in New Dawn 167 [9]. If you appreciate this article,
please consider a contribution [16] to help maintain this website.
Footnotes
- For more information and elaboration on this argument, see my book The Lesser Banishing Ritual of the Pentagram - A 21st Century Grimoire from Megalithica Books.
- See Youtube for the complete video of this event: "Rise Conference - 2 Robots debate the future of Mankind."
- See the Gnostic Gospel of Thomas, Ch. 77
- See "God Only Knows What It's Doing to Our Children's Brains," World Watch, New Dawn 166 (Jan-Feb 2018)
- For the first and most detailed article on this topic see Mark Harris' superb piece for Backchannel entitled "Inside the first church of artificial intelligence"also featured on Wired.com [17].
(C) New Dawn Magazine and the respective author.
For our reproduction notice, click here [18].
Links:
> Feed: Hypergrid Business > Title: Experts: AI Needs Ethics > Author: Alex Korolov > Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 10:52:08 -1000 > Link: https://www.hypergridbusiness.com/2021/01/experts-ai-needs-ethics/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=experts-ai-needs-ethics [image 1](Image courtesy Gerd Altmann via Pixabay.)
Artificial intelligence is increasingly becoming a part of our daily lives, both in the workplace and at home.
Some AI experts are stressing the need to focus on making AI ethical and keeping it human friendly.
Bias in programming, security concerns, and a lack of public knowledge about how AI works are all issues that need to be addressed to develop and maintain a healthy relationship between humans and the technology we use.
[image 2]This is the year AI ethics become absolutely mandatory functions in most businesses, not just talk, Alex Spinelli, chief technology officer at LivePerson and former global head of Alexa OS for Amazon, told Hypergrid Business.
Ethical AI today
Companies are just starting to consider responsible use of AI as a part of their business model.
An increasing number of enterprises are getting behind responsible AI as a component to business success, but only twenty-five percent of companies said unbiased AI is mission-critical, said a 2020 State of AI and Machine Learning Report [3].
There are inherent risks by not considering ethics in your AI thought process, which may include AI not working for a diverse user base, not focusing on wellness and fair pay for the AI supply chain, or creating privacy issues if, for example, your AI is trained using data users didnt consent to be used for that process, said the report. [3]
Data transparency will become increasingly important in the future.
[image 4]Finding companies that truly believe in open source sharing of data, as well as give reassurances via transparency will win the battle of AI. Companies that hoard data and do not share it with the rest of the community will enjoy having marketing buzz, but will ultimately fail to gain trust in both its users as well as the larger community, Josh Rickard, security engineer at security solutions company Swimlane, told Hypergrid Business.
Bias is a big problem in AI programming.
Amazon scrapped a recruiting system [5] that was biased against women. A 2018 ACLU study [6] of Amazons facial recognition software identified twenty-eight members of congress as potential criminals.
Amazon, Google, and Microsoft stopped selling facial recognition [7] technology to law enforcement in 2020 because it was biased against women and people of color.
Organizing an ethical AI future
A variety of new, but non-binding frameworks for ethical AI have been established to further the conversation about the ethical use of AI and to serve as a guiding light in the responsible and secure use of AI technology.
The Partnership on AI, [8] which includes leading companies like Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and IBM, was established in 2016 to formulate best practice in AI technologies, to help advance the publics understanding of how AI works, and to be a platform for discussion about AIs influence on people and society.
The Partnership on AI launched Closing Gaps in Responsible AI [9] in 2020 to help garner insights in how to inform and empower changemakers, activists, and policymakers to develop and manifest responsible AI.
Operationalizing these principles is a complex process in relatively early stages, and currently the gap between intent and practice is large, while documentation on learning from experience remains lacking, said the Partnership on AI on their website [9].
Forty-two countries, known collectively as the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [10], or OECD, came together in 2019 to create value-based principles for the responsible stewardship of trustworthy AI.
These principles state that AI should benefit people and the planet by driving inclusive growth, AI should respect the rule of law and human rights, and there should be transparent disclosure so people can understand and challenge AI-based outcomes.
Security risks should be continually assessed and managed, and organizations and individuals that deploy AI systems should be held accountable for their proper functioning in line with the OECD principles.
This includes knowing when youre interacting with a human or an AI.
You should always know if youre having a conversation with an AI, said Spinelli. It should never pretend to be human.
Even if youre only interacting with AI, a human being should be available at some point in the process.
[image 11]Human-in-the-loop AI is here to stay, Ramprakash Ramamoorthy, product manager at ManageEngine, an ITSM provider serving Fortune 100 companies, told Hypergrid Business.
Virtually no AI models are correct 100% of the time. Algorithmic decision-making requires a human in the loop to verify the integrity of the data, audit the model, provide explanations for decisions, and adjust the model for unseen phenomena, he said.
A human would make sure the data is used as it was meant.
It is vital that the data within AI-models is used as it was intended to be used--and only as it was intended to be used, said Ramamoorthy.
It will likely be a challenge for the regulators to keep up. Despite the probable increase in AI-powered cyberattacks and lawmakers failure to stay ahead of technological innovation, the future of AI looks bright. Artificial intelligence is here to augment humans work lives; it is not going to replace them, he said.
AI is everywhere
[image 12]
Like it or not, AI is here to stay.
I see a lot of pitches from companies and you rarely see software or web product that isn't AI-based, Steve Shwartz, AI investor and author of upcoming book Evil Robots, Killer Computers, and Other Myths: The Truth About AI and the Future of Humanity [13] told Hypergrid Business.
One thing we'll start seeing is companies emerging to help people who develop AI software to make the software not discriminate, make sure its compliant with laws, and to analyze the risks involved in rolling out AI software, said Shwartz.
More compassionate AI
I think 2021 is the year we start to talk about tech where AI becomes more compassionate, said Spinelli.
Spinellis company LivePerson, among others, has taken the EqualAI pledge, [14] in which signers agree to strive to use AI as a tool to reduce harmful bias, and not replicate and spread it.
Weve committed to addressing bias in our own AI technologies and we encourage others to do the same, said Spinelli.
New and friendlier AI-based models are showing up in big business.
We launched something called Bella Loves Me [15], said Spinelli. It's a challenger bank, and what we wanted to do was take an AI experience and really think about how to make it a warm, compassionate empathetic experience. It's not a cold hard evil machine. If you take the view that AI can help us augment us and assist us not replace us we can use that as a guiding light.
Links:
